I. IntroductionThe assassination of Serbian PM Djindjic in March 2003
showed the devastating role of organized crime in South Eastern Europe (SEE).
International analysis and discussions with representatives from the region have
confirmed that one of the most serious problems within the region is transnational
organized crime. Terrorism's link to organized crime has been confirmed and condemned.
The close connection of international terrorism to illegal arms and drug-trafficking,
and money laundering needs an adequate response: enhanced co-ordination of efforts
on national, sub-regional, regional and international levels in order to strengthen
a regional response to this threat. The lack of coordinated action has enabled
organized crime to reach devastating levels, undermining democratization, human
rights, respect for the rule of law and trust in investment and reform efforts.
The overall stability and sovereignty of SEE countries is endangered by organized
crime groups who have infiltrated high level political positions, making their
identification, arrest and prosecution even more complicated.
II. History
of SPOC
The Special Coordinator of the Stability Pact for South Eastern
Europe (SCSP) determined that support and assistance to SEE countries required
coordination on multiple levels simultaneously. In order for such action to be
undertaken as efficiently as possible, the Stability Pact Initiative to fight
Organized Crime (SPOC) was created upon the decision of the Regional Table of
the Stability Pact for SEE and under the framework of Working Table III.
The
overall objective of the SPOC initiative is to strengthen regional capacities
to combat organized crime in accordance with internationally recognized standards.
The Initiative focuses on the adoption of policies, strategies and legislation,
the development of multi-disciplinary inter-agency co-ordination mechanisms, encouraging
the establishment of specialized units and the enhancement of regional and international
co-operation.
For this purpose, a high-level Regional Steering Group
and an Advisory & Contact Group were established. Governments of the region
were asked to nominate representatives responsible for the implementation of the
initiative in co-operation with key law enforcement and judicial authorities using
a multi-disciplinary approach. Reviews of existing information (for example, see
the data base for various bilateral and multilateral projects http://ssr.yciss.yorku.ca/)
on organized crime and meetings to discuss measures to counter organized crime
followed. The final aim was to design needs assessments and country-specific priorities,
work plans, technical assistance programs and measures to promote regional co-operation.
This aim was not achieved by the time of the London conference in late 2002.
III.
The London Conference on Defeating Organized Crime in South Eastern Europe
The
necessity to fight organized crime in the SEE region was reaffirmed by the countries
of the region at the London Conference against Organized Crime by the adoption
of the London
Statement on Defeating Organized Crime in South Eastern Europe which stated
that the countries "will draw on the wide range of regional initiatives,
including the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe" (see also Follow up
to London Conference on Organized Crime).
The London Conference Statement
priority action includes:
- Legislative and institutional harmonization
with European standards;
- Adoption of laws which help crime-fighting
agencies to work more effectively;
- Assurance that law enforcement
agencies have proper technical means;
- Strengthening capacity for financial
investigations;
- Implementing anti-corruption strategies;
- Build
public support for action against crime; and
- Improvement of regional
co-operation.
Recently, the London statement gained higher value due
to the conditionality between serious implementation and further European integration.
IV.
SPOC working structures
Shortly after the Conference, the Stability
Pact formulated concrete policies regarding the combat against organized crime
and opened the SPOC Secretariat in Bucharest. In parallel, measures were initiated
to simplify the existing working structures by merging the Regional Steering Group
and the Advisory & Contact Group into a SPOC Board. Mr. Christian Jechoutek,
Head of International Law Enforcement Cooperation Department, Austrian Federal
Ministry of the Interior, was elected to chair the SPOC Board.
The
SPOC Board
The board will normally meet twice a year, with the next
meetings scheduled for June and November 2003. The chair will invite representatives
of the SEE states, principle International Organizations, the EU, major donor
countries and NGOs active in the research field against organized crime. In general,
the board is open to all actors who intend to commit their efforts to combat organized
crime in SEE: representatives from the law enforcement community, the legal community,
the academic world, regional expertise and the donor community, and it is expected
that the present composition will be broadened.
Contact:
Mr. Christian
Jechoutek
Tel.: +43-1-24836-85200
Email: christian.jechoutek@bmi.gv.at
SPOC
Working Groups
Ideally, the SPOC Board members will form working
groups to cover selected technical and legal issues related to the fight against
organized crime. The chair, in cooperation with the SPOC Secretariat and the SCSP's
Working Table III, will facilitate a dialogue between SPOC board members who wish
to commit themselves through a working group. The chair will formulate common
interests, give advice for launching joint projects and monitor implementation.
His partners will be drawn from member states and organisations of the Stability
Pact.
In addition, SPOC seeks to create synergies with other Stability Pact
initiatives such as Stability Pact Working Table II's Investment Compact, Business
Advisory Council, and Stability Pact Anti-corruption Initiative (SPAI), the Police
Forum and The Task Force on Trafficking in Human Beings. Complementarity and sharing
valuable experience between these activities will be ensured. I.e. police training
programmes could be of high significance for capacity-building activities for
SEE law enforcement officers.
The SPOC Secretariat
The
SPOC Secretariat has been operational since the beginning of 2003. It is located
in the premises of the Regional Center for Combating Transborder Crime in Bucharest.
It consists of, but it is not limited to, a Head of the Secretariat, a Judicial
Expert and an Assistant. The SPOC Secretariat acts as a support body for the practical
implementation of the objectives of the SPOC Initiative. It supports and advises
the SPOC Board and the Special Co-coordinator of the Stability Pact. In 2003,
the Secretariat initiated a number of activities with SPOC board members on enhancing
relations with aforementioned international, European, regional and national actors,
analyzing findings of the first regional needs assessment project of Transcrime
University of Trento (Italy), processing and protection on personal data, witness
protection, and raising public awareness.
Contact:
Ms. Gabriela Konevska,
Head
Tel.: +40-21-303 6003
GSM: +40-723-230 145 and +389-70-24 24 31
Email:
gkonevska@spocsecretariat.org
Mr.
Andrei Furdui, Legal Advisor
Tel.: +40-21-303 6003
Email: afurdui@spocsecretariat.org
Ms.
Alexandra Goreska, Assistant
Tel. : +40-21-303 6003
Fax: +40-21-303 6075
Email
: agoreska@spocsecretariat.org
The
Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe, Working Table III
Politically,
SPOC is supported by the Office of the Special Coordinator, which provides legal
expertise as part of Working Table III (Sub Table on Justice and Home Affairs).
The experts located in Brussels monitor the progress achieved by SPOC and ensure
political support for the work of the Board in its dealings with countries of
SEE.
Contact:
Dr. Sebastian von Münchow
Tel.: +32-2-401 87 26
GSM:
+32-499-52 87 26
Fax: +32-2-401 87 12
Email: sebastian.vonmuenchow@stabilitypact.org
VI.
SPOC at work
SPOC actors discuss informally how best to tackle organized
crime. All partners agree that a multilevel strategy should address, among other
targets, the educational component and awareness campaigns for the civil society,
the adoption of properly adjusted legislative tools, the strengthening of institutional
capacities, the training of specialists, and the development of a direct and fruitful
co-operation, both at the international and regional levels. Regular monitoring
should be conducted in order to assess the impact of the anti-organized crime
policy and to identify further needs and priorities.
The initial priorities
of the SPOC Initiative are data exchange and protection, and witness protection.
The reason to concentrate on these issues is the necessity to enhance communication
between EU member states and EU institutions such as Europol and the SEE region,
be it bilaterally or with regional law enforcement community actors. Data exchange
can take place only under the condition that the SEE countries provides a system
on data protection in accordance with European standards and best practices.
VII.
SPOC in the near future
The SEE region is not homogenous. Though cultural
and historical values may be common assets, the countries in the region are at
different stages of development and each has particular problems and specific
issues to address especially in the fight against organized crime. This heterogeneity
needs to be seriously taken into consideration when developing anti-organized
crime policies.
In order to ensure the success of the working groups, joint
efforts in the fight against organized crime should be based on capacity-building
and enhanced international and regional cooperation. Within this frame, the focus
will be on legal harmonization, effective enforcement, and partnership with the
civil society.
Legal Harmonization
The successful prosecution
of one person in one country is unlikely to impact continuing criminal activities
of a criminal group operating within the region. No country in SEE provides sufficient
legislative tools or the institutional capacity to successfully investigate and
prosecute multi-jurisdictional crimes. Without the requisite criminal legislation
allowing multi-jurisdictional investigations and prosecutions, the creation of
a secure environment, the promotion of rule of law and the promotion of economic
and social well being in SEE cannot be assured.
Legislation needs to address
not only the criminalization of various forms of organized crime, but to also
provide the necessary procedural tools for their efficient investigation, prosecution
and trial in accordance with European standards.
The legislative tools
necessary to investigate prosecute and try multi-jurisdictional organized crime
cases include, but are not limited to, legislation on:
- Protection and
processing of Personal data;
- Witness protection, including aspects
of protection of victims, not only for the duration of the criminal process, but
beyond that point as well;
- The use of special investigative techniques:
interception and monitoring of telecommunications, including those conducted by
computer networks, audio and video surveillance of private and public premises,
covert search of private premises, controlled delivery, use of tracking or positioning
devices, use of undercover investigators, disclosure of financial data;
- Criminal
liability of legal persons, because various entities, such as associations or
foundations, can cover illicit operations;
- Effective disclosure of
financial data and control of money laundering operations and recognition of electronic
evidence as viable evidence in the court;
- Confiscation or seizure
of proceeds from crime;
- Common standards on the collection, preservation
and use of evidence as to allow evidence collected in one country to be used in
the criminal proceedings in another country; and
- The execution of
penal sentences and letters rogatory, extradition of suspects of organized crime
activities, mutual legal assistance and multi-jurisdictional task forces.
Ensuring
effective enforcement
Most SEE countries lack specialized bodies
for the investigation and prosecution of organized crime activities, there is
an absence of effective inter-agency and inter-institutional cooperation, insufficient
logistical support and deficiencies in training.
The solution lies in strengthening
institutional capacity to fight organized crime. Multi-disciplinary national coordinating
mechanisms need to be established throughout the region, which should be primarily
responsible for ensuring the enforcement of the anti-organized crime policy, especially
of the preventive component.
In-country co-operation between agencies involved
in measures for fighting against organized crime must be improved. Joint teams
or task forces - consisting of representatives of the various agencies involved
in this process: police, customs, border police, prosecutors' offices, judicial
experts etc. - should be set up for the investigation of the most serious forms
of organized crime.
Any attempt to structurally dismantle organized crime
groups and operations is bound to fail if insufficient human and logistical resources
are provided. This constitutes one of the most serious problems for the region,
as both experienced specialists and proper technical and financial resources are
insufficient. SPOC will mediate assistance requests from SEE countries, based
on concrete assistance projects and national reform priorities. Training seminars
and study visits can be developed in the same manner.
Promoting the
Partnership with the civil society
Civil society is now a key player
in any anti-crime policy, especially in its preventive component. Ultimately,
state institutions work not only for the society, but also with the society. NGOs,
mass media, the business community and the society as a whole must be involved
in all the stages of the process of fighting organized crime. Partnership with
the civil society should be developed by promoting education campaigns, mainly
focused on vulnerable targets, such as children and women; and informing the civil
society of the results of important investigations and actions in order to promote
transparency with respect to the work of the public institutions.