|
Border Security & Manag't |
Report on the Ohrid Border Process by Amb. Premoze, Chairman
of the WT3 / Ohrid Border Process
The
Ohrid Process for Border Management and Security is a joint effort
by the countries of the region, the EU, the OSCE, NATO and the
Stability Pact to address the very sensitive issues of borders
security and management. Considering the sensitivity of this issue
in a region that saw violent conflicts only a few years ago, coming
together to discuss and work on the matter itself can already
be seen as progress. The
achievements in the field of border security and management have
now become key points of the JHA ministerial dialogue between
the EU and the countries of the Western Balkans. The establishment
of border management systems in line with the EU acquis and model
of EU for external borders is one of the prerequisites for their
eventual integration into the EU. The
implementation phase in which the whole process entered last year
at the First Review Meeting, has led to an important number of
progress in the area, highlighted during the Second Review meeting
which took place in Tirana, on 26-27 October. This
year, six meetings took place, at various levels. In March and
April, respectively Senior and Expert level meetings took place,
where the participants agreed on the priorities, goals and timeline
for the whole process. The four partners met in May in order to
prepare the intermediate Meeting of the Heads of Border Guards/
Services, National Contact Points and the four partners in Zagreb,
in June. The purpose of the latter meeting was to feedback on
the semi-annual reports on the implementation of the Way Forward
Document, delivered by the five countries to the four partners.
The international organisations took the opportunity to reiterate
their will to support the countries in this process, and to discuss
with the countries the areas in which international assistance
is most needed. Practical implementation of legislative and concrete
measures proved to be sometimes uneasy. But this did not prevent
the assessment of limited progress and stressed the need for some
rescheduling/ redefinition of the implementation scheme in order
to address unexpected difficulties, while sticking to the initial
commitments. In
September, the countries and the four partners met in Brussels
to prepare the Second Review Meeting, which took place in Tirana
as mentioned here above. One
year after the First Review Meeting, the Second Review Meeting
was the occasion for the participants of the process to take stock
of and discuss the progress achieved so far and to bring ideas
together on how the future of the whole process should be. Indeed,
the process is not a “one-side exercise”. Therefore,
the partner organisations are ready to share with the participants
how they would like to assist the countries concerned in fulfilling
their task. The
key purpose of the Second Review meeting was to discuss the presentations
delivered by the five countries on the Annual Reports on the implementation
of the Way Forward Document. The implementation of the Way Forward
Document, as well as the Common Platform of the Ohrid Regional
Conference on Border Security and Management, continues to represent
the basis for the activities in the framework of the whole process
and is under constant review. One
of the most ‘visible’ results achieved after one year
and a half, is the fact that the borders in SEE are now - with
some exceptions - entirely under civilian control. At
the same time, the progress regarding the adoption and - most
important - the implementation of the legal framework, did not
develop at the same pace throughout the region. Moreover, cross-border
cooperation in the area of border management is taking shape unevenly
and at different intensity. Some countries are also lagging behind
as regards capacity building in the area of illegal migration. When
introducing the Annual Reports, the representatives of the five
countries informed about the progress achieved in various areas
of implementation of their ‘Ohrid commitments’. These
areas mainly cover:
- Creation
of a legal framework in line with the EU acquis, i.e. implementing
instruments/mechanisms - national strategies on integrated border
management, on action plans and on development of relevant inter-service
“implementation” bodies/ structures.
- Training
of the personnel especially those who will take over the control
of the borders from the military
- Overview
of the needs of the border police in equipment and personnel
- Information
systems
- Signing
of Agreements/ Protocols about cooperation with neighbouring
countries on prevention of border crossing criminals as well
as within each country with other police and customs services
Although
overall assessment of these reports is rather positive, the ‘level
of accuracy ‘ is not the same in all reports. Legal issues
have been addressed, appropriate structures established and main
border crossing points equipped at airports or along main pan
European corridors. However, more attention should be given to
training and IT systems, especially in the wider scope of inter-service
cooperation. In order to provide the beneficiary countries with
more advice/assistance in the field of ‘inter-service relationship’,
more information from their side would be needed. In
order to successfully implement the Ohrid Border Process ‘commitments’
and to keep its dynamics and effectiveness, the partner organisations
have to be ready to continue sharing with the countries concerned
how they would like to assist them in fulfilling their task, including
eventual financial contribution to the implementation of the programmes. As
far as the role of the Stability Pact is concerned, the Ohrid
Border Process together with asylum, migration, refugee return
and visa issues should be considered an integral part of the Stability
Pact core objective on Managing and Stabilizing Population Movements.
Relevant discussion on this issue will take place at the SP Regional
Table/ Working Table III meetings in Skopje, on 17 – 19
November 2004. Following the establishment of the MARRI Regional
Forum and the consequent signing of the Memorandum of Understanding
in Tirana on 2nd of July, the establishment of the MARRI Regional
Centre in Skopje is now well underway and will be officially opened
on 18th November. As
underlined by many participants, continued international assistance
(including a financial one) is needed, particularly in these areas.
Assistance provided so far through the CARDS or PHARE programs/projects,
including twinning projects, was highlighted as an excellent example
in this respect. Other forms of international assistance, e.g.
from USAID, were mentioned as well. The
four partner organisations remain very active in the region, as
highlighted by the update on their respective activities during
the Second Review Meeting. UNMIK/Kosovo is also very active and
regularly reports on its ongoing cooperation with its neighbours,
in the field of border management and security as well as cooperation
in combating organized crime and illegal migration. Training
activities and regional cooperation are also issues that were
addressed during the Review Meeting, as part of the implementation
of the action-oriented measures taken by the countries in the
Ohrid framework. Moreover, the SP is now in the process of gathering
relevant information for its project of “Linking Border
Police to Interpol’s National Central Bureaus”. The
Second Review Meeting was also the occasion to discuss about the
future of the whole process. For 2005, the focus has to be put
on the implementation of the existing ‘Ohrid commitments’
especially as regards the full establishment of strategic and
managerial capacity to implement the integrated border management.
The representatives of the countries concerned also informed the
participants about their specific priorities for the coming year,
in particular regarding the continuation of the process of taking-over
border policing functions from the military, equipment/IT, border
surveillance, human resources, regional/bilateral cooperation,
training and integration with criminal police. For some countries,
visa issues will be equally important. Whether
it be in the Ohrid process or in a different framework, more focus
will be given to the four following points, as they are directly
linked with the future accession of the SaP countries to the Schengen
area:
- Human
resources and training
- Information
systems (incl. communication, processing and analysis)
- Complementarity
and cooperation between border police services and criminal
police
- Cross
border operational cooperation among relevant services all over
the region
The
future of the Ohrid Border Process lies beyond 2005, when national
capacities to implement border management systems would have been
established and when it would be time to focus on establishing
the operational capacities of these systems. A brainstorming meeting
will take place around May 2005 to discuss these issues more in-depth. It
has appeared clear throughout this year and a half of activities,
that the dynamics and effectiveness of the Ohrid Border Process
must be sustained. This process enhances cooperation, coordination,
transparency, accountability and consolidation. The “model
of cooperation” of the four partner organisations has set
a high standard that might be taken up on other issues. The Stability
Pact plays in this process its natural role of facilitator, but
also of contributor. Therefore,
drawing lessons from this process, all the participants agree
that success in this area can only be achieved if the objectives
and Action Plans are based on the real needs of the countries
of the region. Therefore, the countries themselves have chosen
action-oriented measures, which they are committed to implement
within an agreed timeline. In this respect, sharing information
also remains essential. This methodology that proved successful
for building strategic and managerial capacities could now be
extended to the establishment and strengthening of operational
ones. Finally,
keeping in mind all the tasks remaining, the international organisations
used every opportunity to reiterate their support to the whole
process. They will need to join their forces, each of them in
the area where it can have “added value”, hereby speaking
with one single voice and financially contributing to the implementation
of the programmes. |